Here is an article on the proposal:
http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2015/10/11/a-monument-to-mlk-will-crown-stone-mountain/
I think it is a fairly obvious tactic to preserve Confederate monuments. Tack on some monument to an African American nearby and blab on about diversity and tolerance and acknowledgement or whatever.
The leadership in the African American community sees this obvious ploy and has objected to it.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-stone-mountain-martin-luther-king-20151013-story.html
What is interesting is the Georgia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans' response to the proposed monument.
http://gascv.org/scv-responds-to-attempt-to-place-mlk-statue-on-stone-mountain/
From the Georgia SCV press release:
The Georgia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans responded today to the proposal by the Stone Mountain Memorial Association to erect a monument to MLK, former black civil rights activist. This decision by the Stone Mountain Memorial Association is wholly inappropriate in that it is an intentional act of disrespect toward the stated purpose of the Stone Mountain memorial from its inception as well as a possible violation of the law which established the Stone Mountain Memorial Association and charged it with promoting the mountain as a Confederate memorial.Besides showing that the Georgia SCV is none too bright, it also quickly dissipates all their efforts to moderated their image by parading about H.K. Edgerton, making up mythologies about Black Confederate soldiers, and talking about "Heritage Not Hate."
It is always gratifying to see the opposition shoot themselves in the foot.
No comments:
Post a Comment