The capitol letters are exactly as used in the title. Dixie Outfitters are a neo-Confederate retailer of pro-Confederate merchandise.
They have published a lengthy article, "Donald Trump As President Of The Confederacy" online at this URL.
https://dixieoutfitters.com/2017/07/14/donald-trump-as-president-of-the-confederacy/
I think in some sense they are correct.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Sons of Confederate Veterans Votes a resolution of thanks to Donald Trump
In the Nov./Dec. 2017 issue of Confederate Veteran, the official journal of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV), is a resolution passed at the 2017 National Convention of the SCV held in Memphis, TN.
This is the resolution is as follows:
Resolution 3
A Resolution Regarding President Donald Trump
WHEREAS, the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, has shown his recognition of the importance to society of the preservation and teaching of the history of the United States and of honoring the heroism of all military veterans, including Confederate veterans as American veterans, and
WHEREAS, President Trump has been an example to all citizens by pledging a portion of of his salary as President for the maintenance and enhancement of National Battlefield Parks, and especially most recently the Battle of Sharpsburg National Park in Maryland, and continuing to honor the presidential tradition of honoring Confederate veterans in Arlington Cemetery.
THEREFORE, the history honor society, the Sons of Confederate Veterans, expresses its gratitude and appreciation to President Trump for his commitment to American history and all veterans.
Submitted by David R. McAllister, Judah P. Benjamin Camp 2210, Tampa, Florida.
This is the resolution is as follows:
Resolution 3
A Resolution Regarding President Donald Trump
WHEREAS, the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, has shown his recognition of the importance to society of the preservation and teaching of the history of the United States and of honoring the heroism of all military veterans, including Confederate veterans as American veterans, and
WHEREAS, President Trump has been an example to all citizens by pledging a portion of of his salary as President for the maintenance and enhancement of National Battlefield Parks, and especially most recently the Battle of Sharpsburg National Park in Maryland, and continuing to honor the presidential tradition of honoring Confederate veterans in Arlington Cemetery.
THEREFORE, the history honor society, the Sons of Confederate Veterans, expresses its gratitude and appreciation to President Trump for his commitment to American history and all veterans.
Submitted by David R. McAllister, Judah P. Benjamin Camp 2210, Tampa, Florida.
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Dallas, Texas goes for a Confederate Jesus
This is the event on Facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/events/201595480384028/
The house is a one-third replica of Robert E. Lee's Arlington Hall. It isn't just an old plantation home being re-purposed. It was build in the 20th century to glorify the Confederacy and Robert E. Lee.
Dallas doesn't need a plantation Christmas or a Confederate Jesus. It says a lot about Dallas Christianity that this isn't considered an outrage.
https://www.facebook.com/events/201595480384028/
The house is a one-third replica of Robert E. Lee's Arlington Hall. It isn't just an old plantation home being re-purposed. It was build in the 20th century to glorify the Confederacy and Robert E. Lee.
Dallas doesn't need a plantation Christmas or a Confederate Jesus. It says a lot about Dallas Christianity that this isn't considered an outrage.
Thursday, November 09, 2017
Kevin Levin really upset with Henry Louis Gates
Henry Louis Gates is a fool and Kevin Levin is right to go after him with tongs.
These are two recent blogs by Kevin Levin.
However, I raised the issue about Henry Louis Gates in 2011 and was denounced by Kevin Levin.
I attributed this attack to Kevin Levin's reflexive establishmentarianism. That is, if they are people in positions in the historical establishment they are to be accepted and not criticized.
It should be remembered that Gates had a beer with a police officer who abused him.
Gates isn't the first Harvard African American with a friendly attitude towards the Confederacy. Rev. Peter J. Gomes also was friendly towards the Confederacy and tried to get Confederate soldiers inscribed at the Harvard Memorial Church sometime ago. It was going to be done during the summer but I wrote a great many African Americans there and in the end it was thwarted. After that the African American students were wised up to the effort, which was seen as a sneak effort during the summer, there was no chance for it to happen, but that doesn't mean there wasn't an effort.
By the way, PBS televised Ken Burns Civil War series, so they will broadcast any sort of rubbish.
Friday, November 03, 2017
Protest at Lee Parkway, Dallas, Texas, Saturday, Nov. 4th 2-5pm across from the Mayfair
We have a protest planned at Lee Parkway, Dallas, Texas, Saturday, Nov. 4th 2-5pm.
We will be across from the Mayfair condominiums.
This is the launch of our grass roots campaign to de-Confederate Dallas.
We have made up signs and have people signed up to go.
I have had a TV reporter interview me about our planned protest so I think there will be broadcast coverage.
Six residents of the Mayfair complained about Lee Parkway, named after Robert E. Lee being changed because it was too much of a bother, including the president of the Home Owners Association.
This is the link to the video at You Tube of the six Mayfair residents complaining before the Mayor of Dallas and Dallas city council when they were receiving public input. The video was originally three segments since the Mayfair residents didn't do their whining one after the other.
The link to the video is:
https://youtu.be/-HUvN7vB5ec
Click on the video to see the entire video. SET VOLUME TO MAXIMUM.
CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO SEE THE ENTIRE IMAGE.
Notice the rhinestones for the "i"s.
We will be across from the Mayfair condominiums.
This is the launch of our grass roots campaign to de-Confederate Dallas.
We have made up signs and have people signed up to go.
I have had a TV reporter interview me about our planned protest so I think there will be broadcast coverage.
Six residents of the Mayfair complained about Lee Parkway, named after Robert E. Lee being changed because it was too much of a bother, including the president of the Home Owners Association.
This is the link to the video at You Tube of the six Mayfair residents complaining before the Mayor of Dallas and Dallas city council when they were receiving public input. The video was originally three segments since the Mayfair residents didn't do their whining one after the other.
The link to the video is:
https://youtu.be/-HUvN7vB5ec
Click on the video to see the entire video. SET VOLUME TO MAXIMUM.
CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO SEE THE ENTIRE IMAGE.
How real is the Texas Nationalist movement.
The Texas Nationalist movement has a Facebook page with 224,133 likes and 215,304 following it as of this morning 11/3/2017.
https://www.facebook.com/texasnatmov/
That is fairly impressive. There are web pages with a lot of content. The link below is to one page and you can then view a lot of material and other online pages from there.
https://texasnationalist.com/
However, exactly what is the extent of the Texas Nationalist Movement in terms of people.
I haven't found a board of directors or similar grouping for the organization. Is there an executive committee? Is there an editorial committee for their publications?
Has there been a statewide convention of members and delegates?
When did the head of the Texas Nationalist movement get elected? When is the term of office up? How are elections for the leadership conducted? More broadly how is the leadership selected? Is there a body that appoints the leaders?
The organization is still worth tracking. Even if it is largely a one person show it is still getting out to the public a secessionist message. It appears from reports that there is support for this organization by foreign powers.
If a real Texas secession movement gets underway it is likely that this organization will be pushed aside, but it will have performed a function of paving the way for a Texas secessionist movement. If there is a real movement, and I mean a movement of a significant number of people, I suspect that they will want to elect their leadership.
So far, Texas secession seems to be nothing more than online gripping. Despite all the Facebook likes the Texas nationalist movement was unable to get enough signatures to get a secession measure on the ballot in Texas. The number of required signatures were 68 thousand some. Roughly a quarter of their Facebook likes.
http://newtknight.blogspot.com/2015/12/texas-nationalist-movement-petition.html#.WfxmoWhSyiM
On the other hand, Boys State in Texas decided to vote for the secession of Texas.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/06/26/in-a-first-texas-boys-state-votes-to-secede-from-the-union/?utm_term=.9423d43de525
As I reported earlier pressure applied to the Texas Republican Party nearly got secession in their 2016 platform. It lost by only 16 to 14.
These are some blog postings with more details.
With Donald Trump being president and his slogan being about making America great again, the Texas Nationalist movement seems to be stalled.
However, it would be wrong to dismiss the Texas Nationalist movement. They are putting out arguments for secession and they are building up a body of narratives of grievance. They are establishing awareness of their efforts and have people in various degrees of contact with them.
The future is opaque. It could happen in the course of events that there will be some sudden real interest in secession by reactionaries in Texas. For example the election of a Democrat to the presidency. These potential secessionists will find a ready made set of narratives to use for their efforts and a number of individuals who have given it some thought and are educated in the arguments for secession.
Secessionism in the body politic is like a herpes virus. It is there and usually unnoticed until the body politic is stressed and then there are sores. In 2016 it seemed that Texas secession might erupt.
http://www.chron.com/news/politics/election/article/Poll-Three-out-of-five-Texans-support-secession-9146807.php
One big question avoided by the Texas Nationalist movement is what about the regions, counties, cities, etc. that don't want to secede from the United States. I have raised this before.
http://newtknight.blogspot.com/2016/06/some-considerations-about-texas.html#.WfxoD2hSyiM
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/posts/1748950508659231
They also think that you can break up the nation with a 50.1% majority. A constitutional amendment takes 3/4 vote of states. I would think that you would want a super majority to make sure you don't make decisions based on transitory passions.
If it is all about determination I say that each county and city can have a say also. Secessionists are always localists for their particular national project but nationalists against any secessionists in their proposed nation. I wrote up a "Forever American Declaration." I am sure someone might write up something better.
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/photos/a.1734954363392179.1073741827.1686197881601161/1740219879532294/?type=3&theater
If there is a vote for secession the urban regions of Texas will likely be against it and expect their U.S. government to protect them and the U.S. government will be more than willing to do so. Similarly reprisals against American citizens in other parts of Texas.
The Texas nationalist movement is a right wing movement in a state that is increasingly not right wing, but has a right wing government sustained by gerrymandering. Texas nationalism is really a reactionary project by those who don't see a future political success in the United States for their reactionary agenda. There isn't a Texas nationalism as the Texas nationalist movement defines it across the general public.
Texas is changing. I think that a lot of Republicans are not willing to face that they might be a minority party in the future, so there are all these voter restriction laws being struck down by the courts. So I think when the change starts coming there might be a panicked irrational response that would provide an opening for Texas secessionists. The objective would be to have an independent state with likely voter qualifications that would maintain reactionary control. I wouldn't be surprised that a poll tax might be proposed, even property qualifications.
As of this time the Texas nationalist movement is fairly dormant, but it is there and there is a lot of potential for trouble in the future.
By the way there is a Facebook page against Texas secession.
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/
https://www.facebook.com/texasnatmov/
That is fairly impressive. There are web pages with a lot of content. The link below is to one page and you can then view a lot of material and other online pages from there.
https://texasnationalist.com/
However, exactly what is the extent of the Texas Nationalist Movement in terms of people.
I haven't found a board of directors or similar grouping for the organization. Is there an executive committee? Is there an editorial committee for their publications?
Has there been a statewide convention of members and delegates?
When did the head of the Texas Nationalist movement get elected? When is the term of office up? How are elections for the leadership conducted? More broadly how is the leadership selected? Is there a body that appoints the leaders?
The organization is still worth tracking. Even if it is largely a one person show it is still getting out to the public a secessionist message. It appears from reports that there is support for this organization by foreign powers.
If a real Texas secession movement gets underway it is likely that this organization will be pushed aside, but it will have performed a function of paving the way for a Texas secessionist movement. If there is a real movement, and I mean a movement of a significant number of people, I suspect that they will want to elect their leadership.
So far, Texas secession seems to be nothing more than online gripping. Despite all the Facebook likes the Texas nationalist movement was unable to get enough signatures to get a secession measure on the ballot in Texas. The number of required signatures were 68 thousand some. Roughly a quarter of their Facebook likes.
http://newtknight.blogspot.com/2015/12/texas-nationalist-movement-petition.html#.WfxmoWhSyiM
On the other hand, Boys State in Texas decided to vote for the secession of Texas.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/06/26/in-a-first-texas-boys-state-votes-to-secede-from-the-union/?utm_term=.9423d43de525
As I reported earlier pressure applied to the Texas Republican Party nearly got secession in their 2016 platform. It lost by only 16 to 14.
These are some blog postings with more details.
With Donald Trump being president and his slogan being about making America great again, the Texas Nationalist movement seems to be stalled.
However, it would be wrong to dismiss the Texas Nationalist movement. They are putting out arguments for secession and they are building up a body of narratives of grievance. They are establishing awareness of their efforts and have people in various degrees of contact with them.
The future is opaque. It could happen in the course of events that there will be some sudden real interest in secession by reactionaries in Texas. For example the election of a Democrat to the presidency. These potential secessionists will find a ready made set of narratives to use for their efforts and a number of individuals who have given it some thought and are educated in the arguments for secession.
Secessionism in the body politic is like a herpes virus. It is there and usually unnoticed until the body politic is stressed and then there are sores. In 2016 it seemed that Texas secession might erupt.
http://www.chron.com/news/politics/election/article/Poll-Three-out-of-five-Texans-support-secession-9146807.php
One big question avoided by the Texas Nationalist movement is what about the regions, counties, cities, etc. that don't want to secede from the United States. I have raised this before.
http://newtknight.blogspot.com/2016/06/some-considerations-about-texas.html#.WfxoD2hSyiM
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/posts/1748950508659231
They also think that you can break up the nation with a 50.1% majority. A constitutional amendment takes 3/4 vote of states. I would think that you would want a super majority to make sure you don't make decisions based on transitory passions.
If it is all about determination I say that each county and city can have a say also. Secessionists are always localists for their particular national project but nationalists against any secessionists in their proposed nation. I wrote up a "Forever American Declaration." I am sure someone might write up something better.
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/photos/a.1734954363392179.1073741827.1686197881601161/1740219879532294/?type=3&theater
If there is a vote for secession the urban regions of Texas will likely be against it and expect their U.S. government to protect them and the U.S. government will be more than willing to do so. Similarly reprisals against American citizens in other parts of Texas.
The Texas nationalist movement is a right wing movement in a state that is increasingly not right wing, but has a right wing government sustained by gerrymandering. Texas nationalism is really a reactionary project by those who don't see a future political success in the United States for their reactionary agenda. There isn't a Texas nationalism as the Texas nationalist movement defines it across the general public.
Texas is changing. I think that a lot of Republicans are not willing to face that they might be a minority party in the future, so there are all these voter restriction laws being struck down by the courts. So I think when the change starts coming there might be a panicked irrational response that would provide an opening for Texas secessionists. The objective would be to have an independent state with likely voter qualifications that would maintain reactionary control. I wouldn't be surprised that a poll tax might be proposed, even property qualifications.
As of this time the Texas nationalist movement is fairly dormant, but it is there and there is a lot of potential for trouble in the future.
By the way there is a Facebook page against Texas secession.
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/
Thursday, November 02, 2017
2 + 2 = ? The arithmetic of the Texas Nationalist Movement.
The Texas Nationalist movement, which I think has at least more than 10 members, has a web page with the headline, "HUGE!! 68% of U.S. Voters Open to Secession in Zogby Poll!"
Must be a sale on exclamation marks at Walmart.
https://texasnationalist.com/news/huge-68-of-u-s-voters-open-to-secession-in-zogby-poll
There is a link to this poll.
http://johnzogbystrategies.com/new-poll-on-americans-support-for-secession-webinar-on-tribal-analytics-and-trump-report-card/
The poll actually is about whether the Federal government should compel a seceding state to remain in the United States, but not whether the respondent supports secession.
So in terms of whether the military should be called out, 32% agree. As to those who would just let the state go, 39% agree, and 29% are unsure. So in reality 39% of the voters support a state deciding to secede to not be compelled to remain in the United States. The polls doesn't ask if a person believes their state should secede.
So there isn't a ground swell for secession, there are people who don't believe a state should be compelled to remain.
You need to always be very careful in reading postings by the Texas Nationalist movement.
The question needs to be asked if a majority of a state wanted to secede but majorities in sections or regions didn't want to secede should these regions and sections be compelled to secede.
The think about secession is once adopted it has no logical stop. The logical conclusion is that the people on the 3400 block of East Swampy Avenue don't want people outside 3400 block of East Swampy Avenue to tell them what to do, and the odd numbered houses are getting a little fed up with the even numbered houses on the block.
This might be very amusing but in the 2016 Texas Republican Party convention in Dallas, Texas the platform committee only voted down a secession plank by 16 to 14 with one abstaining. For a party that claims that it is patriotic you would think it would be 31 to 0.
Incidentally the Facebook against Texas secession is at this link.
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/
Must be a sale on exclamation marks at Walmart.
https://texasnationalist.com/news/huge-68-of-u-s-voters-open-to-secession-in-zogby-poll
There is a link to this poll.
http://johnzogbystrategies.com/new-poll-on-americans-support-for-secession-webinar-on-tribal-analytics-and-trump-report-card/
The poll actually is about whether the Federal government should compel a seceding state to remain in the United States, but not whether the respondent supports secession.
There is a difference in the question of whether I would like a piece of chocolate cake versus whether I think people should be compelled to eat chocolate cake.
Over Labor Day Weekend, a nationwide poll of 800 likely voters, conducted by John Zogby Strategies asked, among other questions, which view is closer to their own on the topic of secession; Statement A: If a majority of residents within a given state prefer to have the final say over their destiny without the control of Washington D.C. then let them have it – it is their right. Statement B: If residents within a given state were to take such a drastic measure and secede from the United States, the federal government would be justified in sending in the military to prevent secession from taking place.
So in terms of whether the military should be called out, 32% agree. As to those who would just let the state go, 39% agree, and 29% are unsure. So in reality 39% of the voters support a state deciding to secede to not be compelled to remain in the United States. The polls doesn't ask if a person believes their state should secede.
So there isn't a ground swell for secession, there are people who don't believe a state should be compelled to remain.
You need to always be very careful in reading postings by the Texas Nationalist movement.
The question needs to be asked if a majority of a state wanted to secede but majorities in sections or regions didn't want to secede should these regions and sections be compelled to secede.
The think about secession is once adopted it has no logical stop. The logical conclusion is that the people on the 3400 block of East Swampy Avenue don't want people outside 3400 block of East Swampy Avenue to tell them what to do, and the odd numbered houses are getting a little fed up with the even numbered houses on the block.
This might be very amusing but in the 2016 Texas Republican Party convention in Dallas, Texas the platform committee only voted down a secession plank by 16 to 14 with one abstaining. For a party that claims that it is patriotic you would think it would be 31 to 0.
Incidentally the Facebook against Texas secession is at this link.
https://www.facebook.com/TexansTruetotheUnion/