Richard T. Hines was an editor for Southern Partisan and is an active Neo-Confederate.
This is a very interesting article about him and lobbyists overseas in Nigeria.
Link to New York Times article.
This article gives more back ground on Richard T. Hines.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050829/blumenthal
Monday, April 30, 2007
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Council of Conservative Citizens 2008 Election page/ CCC at Presidential Events in South Carolina
The Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC) has added a blog and has tagged some of the items as 2008 election items. This is the link.
http://cofcc.wordpress.com/tag/election-08/
However, they don't seem to have all the election 2008 items tagged.
For example, at this link they talk about being at a McCain campaign event but it isn't tagged.
http://cofcc.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/charleston-cofcc-on-site-at-mccain-rally/
This item has a "Read More" link to the following:
http://heritagelost.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/charleston-cofcc-on-site-at-mccain-rally/
I think we can expect the neo-Confederates to be active in South Carolina campaigning against candidates they don't like. The South Carolina CCC report mentions that the League of the South was there also. Whether it will continue to be 3 or 10 people or will have more people involved, we will have to just wait and see.
I am going to put the link to the tagged items on my presidential page which is at:
http://www.templeofdemocracy.com/presidentialcandidates2008.htm
http://cofcc.wordpress.com/tag/election-08/
However, they don't seem to have all the election 2008 items tagged.
For example, at this link they talk about being at a McCain campaign event but it isn't tagged.
http://cofcc.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/charleston-cofcc-on-site-at-mccain-rally/
This item has a "Read More" link to the following:
http://heritagelost.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/charleston-cofcc-on-site-at-mccain-rally/
I think we can expect the neo-Confederates to be active in South Carolina campaigning against candidates they don't like. The South Carolina CCC report mentions that the League of the South was there also. Whether it will continue to be 3 or 10 people or will have more people involved, we will have to just wait and see.
I am going to put the link to the tagged items on my presidential page which is at:
http://www.templeofdemocracy.com/presidentialcandidates2008.htm
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Article on Thomas Woods at DePaul University
The DePaul University campus has been alerted that there is more to Thomas Woods than being some conservative Catholic historian. This article was printed in the student newspaper for that university.
http://www.thedepaulia.com/story.asp?artid=2287§id=4
The Thomas Woods website is http://www.thomasewoods.com/ The URL given in the article forgot the middle "e". Wood's website omits the articles he wrote for the League of the South and which were published in their periodical, Southern Patriot.
Thomas Woods is Associate Editor of Latin Mass magazine. http://www.latinmassmagazine.com/
http://www.thedepaulia.com/story.asp?artid=2287§id=4
The Thomas Woods website is http://www.thomasewoods.com/ The URL given in the article forgot the middle "e". Wood's website omits the articles he wrote for the League of the South and which were published in their periodical, Southern Patriot.
Thomas Woods is Associate Editor of Latin Mass magazine. http://www.latinmassmagazine.com/
Friday, April 13, 2007
I am mentioned in the "New York Sun"
I am mentioned in the "New York Sun" concerning presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani and his stance on the Confederate flag.
http://www.nysun.com/article/52276
I am mentioned on page 3 at the end.
http://www.nysun.com/article/52276
I am mentioned on page 3 at the end.
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Giuliani takes position on Confederate flag
These are some articles on Rudy Giuliani and his position relating to the Confederate flag.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/us/politics/11rudy.html?ref=politics
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4703442.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6547495,00.html
Giuliani feels it should be left to the states. He side steps the issue of what the Confederate flag means or that it is a symbol of white supremacy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/us/politics/11rudy.html?ref=politics
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4703442.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6547495,00.html
Giuliani feels it should be left to the states. He side steps the issue of what the Confederate flag means or that it is a symbol of white supremacy.
Saturday, April 07, 2007
Oh Please! Columbia, SC publication public relations blather
In this article in The State, the major paper of South Carolina, the city of Columbia urges the media not to have all the interviews in front of the Confederate flag on the state house grounds.
http://www.thestate.com/426/story/29377.html
The flag was put there to be prominent, to be seen, and so as a consequence it is being seen. The purpose of a flag is to declare identity.
So to whine about the media coverage that includes the flag is somewhat hypocritical. It is like putting up a bill board and complaining that people are reading it. I think this news story is one of those managing public opinion news stories that major dailies put out. If the Confederate flag gives the state of South Carolina a negative image, it isn't because the state of South Carolina did something stupid, but it is the fault of the big bad news media.
Note to The State, state of South Carolina, you made your bed, now you sleep in it.
http://www.thestate.com/426/story/29377.html
The flag was put there to be prominent, to be seen, and so as a consequence it is being seen. The purpose of a flag is to declare identity.
So to whine about the media coverage that includes the flag is somewhat hypocritical. It is like putting up a bill board and complaining that people are reading it. I think this news story is one of those managing public opinion news stories that major dailies put out. If the Confederate flag gives the state of South Carolina a negative image, it isn't because the state of South Carolina did something stupid, but it is the fault of the big bad news media.
Note to The State, state of South Carolina, you made your bed, now you sleep in it.
Bilboization of the Republican Party & Neo-Confederacy
As reported in the Dallas Morning News and other publications, Republican State Senator Dan Patrick of Houston boycotted a prayer by Imam Yusuf Kavakci.
The story is reported at the following websites.
Link to article in San Antonio paper.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4689405.html
For those who don't know who Bilbo was, I have these two links
http://www.mdah.state.ms.us/pubs/bilbo.pdf
Bilbo was a viciously racist individual and the above link gives a back ground of his life. The following link is his congressional career.
http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=b000460
First there are some aspects of this story that show that Dan Patrick talks out both sides of his mouth or is incapable of logical thinking.
Patrick explains his walk out as follows in the Houston Chronicle.
"Republican Sen. Dan Patrick on Wednesday boycotted the first prayer delivered in the Texas Senate by a Muslim cleric, and then praised religious tolerance and freedom of speech in an address at the end of the day's session.
"I think that it's important that we are tolerant as a people of all faiths, but that doesn't mean we have to endorse all faiths, and that was my decision," he said later.
"I surely believe that everyone should have the right to speak, but I didn't want my attendance on the floor to appear that I was endorsing that."
Evidently both Eagle Forum and the Harris County Republican Party criticized having an Imam speak, on the pretext that it was too close to Easter. (Houston is in Harris County.) The Imam was asked to do the opening prayer by State Sen. Florence Shapiro - Republican Plano (suburb north of Dallas).
Dan Patrick is also a right wing radio talk show host in Dallas and Houston.
I see this as an erosion of control of the Republican party agenda by the Republican party establishment. They may in certain venues pander to various extreme elements in the Republican party, but I doubt that they want these elements setting the agenda. If in 2008 Dan Patrick and his wing of the Republican party get re-elected and Florence Shapiro loses out in the primaries because of this issues and others like it, the Texas Republican party will really go off the deep end. Bilboization will be seen as the ticket to political success and there will be competition to be more Bilbo than the other candidate. On the other hand, the Republican party may edge Patrick out some way. Looking into the future is like looking through some wavy and murky piece of glass. Mostly we have to wait and see. However, I think that in waiting we should observe whether the Republican party is going to evolve into a Solid South type of party that has marched way off the mainstream of America.
The Neo-Confederates are hoping to capture popular political support by advancing an agenda appealing to various hostilities. However, they may be beaten to the punch by the Republican party. The Neo-Confederate impact may not be directly through electoral politics, but instead through shaping of public opinion. What happens in the South Carolina Republican primary in 2008 will be especially interesting to see what impact the Neo-Confederates have. They appear to have some political strength there and are organized there. The Confederate flag issue is still alive there. The Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) is now run by outspoken Neo-Confederates. The Commander-in-Chief (C-i-C) is the editor of Southern Partisan magazine. The South Carolina primary affords a huge opportunity to get the Neo-Confederate in the news and have an impact.
When the Republican party has their convention in 2008, it will be interesting to see if delegates from some of the former Confederate states fly Confederate flags in the convention hall. With the Republican establishment control over the Republican party eroding, I am not so sure they will be able to manage the convention and produce the big show.
The story is reported at the following websites.
Link to article in San Antonio paper.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4689405.html
For those who don't know who Bilbo was, I have these two links
http://www.mdah.state.ms.us/pubs/bilbo.pdf
Bilbo was a viciously racist individual and the above link gives a back ground of his life. The following link is his congressional career.
http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=b000460
First there are some aspects of this story that show that Dan Patrick talks out both sides of his mouth or is incapable of logical thinking.
Patrick explains his walk out as follows in the Houston Chronicle.
"Republican Sen. Dan Patrick on Wednesday boycotted the first prayer delivered in the Texas Senate by a Muslim cleric, and then praised religious tolerance and freedom of speech in an address at the end of the day's session.
"I think that it's important that we are tolerant as a people of all faiths, but that doesn't mean we have to endorse all faiths, and that was my decision," he said later.
"I surely believe that everyone should have the right to speak, but I didn't want my attendance on the floor to appear that I was endorsing that."
Evidently both Eagle Forum and the Harris County Republican Party criticized having an Imam speak, on the pretext that it was too close to Easter. (Houston is in Harris County.) The Imam was asked to do the opening prayer by State Sen. Florence Shapiro - Republican Plano (suburb north of Dallas).
Dan Patrick is also a right wing radio talk show host in Dallas and Houston.
I see this as an erosion of control of the Republican party agenda by the Republican party establishment. They may in certain venues pander to various extreme elements in the Republican party, but I doubt that they want these elements setting the agenda. If in 2008 Dan Patrick and his wing of the Republican party get re-elected and Florence Shapiro loses out in the primaries because of this issues and others like it, the Texas Republican party will really go off the deep end. Bilboization will be seen as the ticket to political success and there will be competition to be more Bilbo than the other candidate. On the other hand, the Republican party may edge Patrick out some way. Looking into the future is like looking through some wavy and murky piece of glass. Mostly we have to wait and see. However, I think that in waiting we should observe whether the Republican party is going to evolve into a Solid South type of party that has marched way off the mainstream of America.
The Neo-Confederates are hoping to capture popular political support by advancing an agenda appealing to various hostilities. However, they may be beaten to the punch by the Republican party. The Neo-Confederate impact may not be directly through electoral politics, but instead through shaping of public opinion. What happens in the South Carolina Republican primary in 2008 will be especially interesting to see what impact the Neo-Confederates have. They appear to have some political strength there and are organized there. The Confederate flag issue is still alive there. The Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) is now run by outspoken Neo-Confederates. The Commander-in-Chief (C-i-C) is the editor of Southern Partisan magazine. The South Carolina primary affords a huge opportunity to get the Neo-Confederate in the news and have an impact.
When the Republican party has their convention in 2008, it will be interesting to see if delegates from some of the former Confederate states fly Confederate flags in the convention hall. With the Republican establishment control over the Republican party eroding, I am not so sure they will be able to manage the convention and produce the big show.